The profit split comparison usually begins with a percentage: 80%, 90%, 95%. That number is easy to misread. It is not the share of your account growth that arrives in your bank. It is the share of a profit pool that the contract defines, after the contract's deductions and before its payout limits.
Two firms can advertise the same split and pay different amounts. One defines profit after commissions and swaps; the other defines it before costs. One applies the split after the cap; the other applies the cap after the split. One lets you withdraw half the eligible profit; the other lets you withdraw all of it. The headline percentage does not tell you which set of rules you are buying.
The split is a share of a defined pool
Start with the word "profit". In a prop contract, it usually means closed profit above the initial account balance, not the total equity shown on the dashboard. An open winner may not count until it is closed. A commission may reduce the profit pool. A swap or platform fee may reduce it further. A withdrawal may change the balance from which the next profit is measured.
FTMO's futures rules are a useful example of the separation. The page has distinct sections for payout eligibility, the withdrawable amount, the payout cap and the payout ratio. Those are not synonyms. The withdrawable amount tells you what share of profit above the initial balance you may request. The cap tells you the maximum request. The ratio tells you how the request is split with the firm. Reading only the ratio misses two constraints.
Ask for the definition in writing. Is profit measured from the initial balance or from the last payout? Is it closed or unrealised? Is it net of commissions, swaps and data fees? Does a payout reduce the balance and therefore the next profit pool? The answers change the effective percentage.
The payout waterfall
A payout is easier to understand as a waterfall. Each stage reduces or reshapes the amount before the next stage.
1. Gross trading profit. The starting number is usually the closed profit on the account, not the account equity.
2. Costs and deductions. Commissions, swaps and any platform or data charges may come off before the split.
3. Eligible profit. The contract may count only profit above the initial balance, or only profit generated since the last payout.
4. Withdrawable share. Some plans let you request all eligible profit; others let you request a percentage and leave the rest in the account.
5. Payout cap. A per-request ceiling can bind before the split is calculated, or after it.
6. Profit split. The firm's share is taken from the amount that survives the earlier stages.
7. Payment costs. A wire fee, conversion cost or processing charge can reduce the cash that reaches you.
Change one step and the same headline split produces a different payment.
Same headline, different result
Take a purely hypothetical contract. The account has $10,000 of closed profit above the initial balance. The contract allows you to withdraw 50% of eligible profit, caps a request at $4,000 and pays a 90% split.
If the split is applied after the cap, the calculation is: $10,000 × 50% = $5,000 eligible; the $4,000 cap binds; 90% of $4,000 is $3,600 to the trader. If the split is applied before the cap, the calculation is: $10,000 × 50% = $5,000; 90% of $5,000 is $4,500; the $4,000 cap then binds, so the trader receives $4,000. The difference is $400 from the order of operations alone.
Neither version is dishonest. They are different contracts. The mistake is comparing the 90% figures as if they were the same number.
This is why a split table without a formula is close to useless. The table can tell you the firm's share. It cannot tell you the pool, the cap, the share or the order.
Profit is not always the same profit
Three definitions cause most of the confusion.
Closed versus open. A firm may count only closed profit at the end of the day. An open position that is winning does not increase the payout pool until it is closed. A trader who requests a payout while the best trade is still open may find the eligible amount is lower than the dashboard suggests.
Above initial balance versus total equity. A funded account may start with a nominal balance. The firm may count only profit above that starting figure, not the full equity. A withdrawal can reduce the balance and reset the starting point for the next calculation. Read whether the next payout is measured from the original balance or the post-withdrawal balance.
Net versus gross. A 90% split on gross profit is not the same as a 90% split on profit after commissions, swaps and platform charges. The difference is usually small per trade and material over a payout cycle. The contract should say which costs are deducted before the split.
New profit versus carried profit. Some firms require a proportion of each request to come from new profit generated in the current cycle. That rule can delay a payout even when the account is profitable. It is not a split percentage, but it changes the cash conversion.
Scaling plans change the headline
A base split is not always the long-run split. Some firms raise the percentage after a number of profitable cycles; others keep the percentage fixed and increase the account size instead. Those are different offers.
A 90% split that applies after six months is not the same as 90% from the first payout. A 90% split on a larger account can pay more dollars than a 95% split on a smaller one. Compare the path, not just the first row of the table.
Ask whether the split can fall as well as rise. Ask what happens after a losing cycle, a reset or a change of plan. A scaling schedule is part of the contract, not a loyalty reward.
The cap is not the split
A high split cannot overome a low cap. A 95% share of a $500 request is $475; an 80% share of a $5,000 request is $4,000. The lower percentage pays more because the pool is larger.
That does not make the higher split irrelevant. It means the split belongs in a table with the cap, the withdrawable share and the payout frequency. A firm that wins on one row can lose on the next.
The useful comparison is cash conversion: how much net cash reaches you for each dollar of trading profit, after the contract's definitions and limits. That number requires your own profit profile, not a marketing table.
What to ask before comparing percentages
Ask for the exact formula in writing. Then ask these six questions:
- What counts as profit: closed or open, gross or net, above the initial balance or total equity?
- What share of eligible profit can I request, and what stays in the account?
- Is the per-request cap applied before or after the split?
- Is the cap gross or net of the firm's share?
- Does the payout reduce the balance used for the next calculation?
- What fees or conversion costs are deducted before the money is sent?
If the firm cannot answer those questions in plain language, the headline split is not a comparable number. It is a slogan.
The percentage is the beginning of the calculation, not the end. The contract's definition of profit and its order of operations decide what you keep.
Trading futures and leveraged products carries a substantial risk of loss. Prop-firm accounts are simulated trading programmes, not brokerage accounts or investments, and fees are not deposits. The dollar example is illustrative, not a firm quote. This article is research, not financial advice. Verify the current terms before buying.
Disclosure: No affiliate or referral links. Alphaex Capital is independent research. This article is educational and not financial advice.
Bio: Alphaex Capital researches trading platforms, prop-firm pricing and market structure. We publish the fee tables and contract clauses that marketing pages tend to bury. Read more at alphaexcapital.com.
Sources
No comments:
Post a Comment